Women’s Sports Facts

This compilation of facts is a representative sample of the data that exists in women’s sports as of the publication date. Topics include the benefits of sports participation, leadership and employment, race and ethnicity, sport and disability, participation across the ages, media coverage, and the business of sports.

Progress Without Equity

This first-of-its-kind report on gender and high school sports participation, “Progress Without Equity: The Provision of High School Athletic Opportunity in the United States, by Gender 1993-94 through 2005-06,” flows from an analysis of high schools that is unprecedented in its national and historical scope. It uses merged data from the Civil Rights Data Collection and the Common Core of Data, which is collected by the National Center for Education Statistics.

The report examines gender differences in athletic opportunity in a nationally representative sample of 24,370 public four-year high schools across 1993-94, 1999-2000 and 2005-06. Three measures of the extent of athletic opportunity are documented including the number of athletic participation opportunities, the number of teams, and the number of sports. This report was authored by Don Sabo, Ph.D., Professor of Health Policy, D’Youville College, and Phil Veliz, M.S., University at Buffalo, the State University of New York.

The key findings in “Progress Without Equity” include:

  • While high schools gradually increased their allocations of athletic participation opportunities between 1993-94 and 2005-06, progress toward closing the gender gap slowed after 2000.
  • Boys received a larger proportion of athletic participation opportunities than girls did for each school year in all communities (i.e., urban, suburban, town, and rural). The lowest percentages of athletic participation opportunities occurred in urban schools, whereas the highest percentages were issued in rural schools.
  • Schools with greater economic resources provided more athletic participation opportunities for their students—both girls and boys—than their less fiscally sound counterparts.
  • Girls were provided proportionately fewer athletic participation opportunities than boys during each school year and in all geographic regions (i.e., Northeast, Midwest, South and West.

This report provides educators and policymakers at the national and state levels with new and more accurate information. The data presented here reflect the provision of athletic opportunities to U.S. girls and boys during an historical period in which the influence of Titles IX was growing. The results show that while some progress was made toward expanding the opportunity sector of interscholastic sports to include more girls between 1993-94 and 2005/06, gender equity was not achieved.

Sexual Orientation Discrimination in Sport

On June 24, 2009, Massachusetts Representative Barney Frank submitted a bill to the United States House of Representatives that, if passed by both houses of Congress and signed by President Obama, would prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), as the bill is known, would ensure fair employment practices by making it illegal to fire, refuse to hire, or fail to promote an employee based on real or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. Religious organizations, the military and businesses with a small number of employees would be exempt from the law. The first version of this “gay rights” bill was introduced in 1974 by Representatives Bella Abzug and Ed Koch from New York. Thirty-five years later, prospects for passage of this basic civil rights protection into federal law are much better, and reflect changing societal perspectives on lesbian, bisexual, gay, and transgender rights.

Currently twenty states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. Twelve of these states also prohibit discrimination based on gender identity/expression. In addition, many cities and towns across the US have similar laws. If it became law, ENDA would be the first federal law extending non-discrimination protection based on sexual orientation.

A version of ENDA that did not include gender identity/expression was introduced in 2007, but was not acted on. ENDA supporters in the legislature believed that they could not pass the bill with gender identity included. The decision to drop protections for gender identity discrimination prompted several gay rights organizations and leaders to withdraw their support of ENDA if it did not include protections on the basis of gender identity and expression.

So, what does ENDA have to do with sports? It is a sad and shameful truth that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people (or those perceived to be) are still discriminated against in sports. Prospective women coaches are still not hired because they are (or are perceived to be) lesbian or bisexual. Women coaches thought to be lesbian or bisexual are harassed, stereotyped, fired or targeted for negative recruiting by rival coaches.

Male coaches who are gay or perceived to be gay would also be protected by ENDA. Though men’s sports has traditionally been perceived to be a hostile environment for gay men, more gay coaches, administrators, athletic trainers and other staff are choosing to identify themselves. Negative recruiting against male coaches based on sexual orientation is an increasing problem as gay men become more visible in sport. Until women’s and men’s sports eliminate homophobia, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender athletic employees need legal protections from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, not just in twenty states, but in all fifty states. That is what a federal non-discrimination law would ensure.

Challenging sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination is possible, even without a federal law prohibiting discrimination. (The Women’s Sports Foundation’s It Takes A Team initiative includes information on laws and legal resources to combat discrimination.) However, a federal law would extend discrimination protection to all states and would provide employees targeted by gender and sexual orientation discrimination with a powerful additional legal tool equivalent to other federal laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex, race, religion, national origin and disability.

Passage of ENDA would provide federal protection from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression for employees in athletics: athletic administrators, coaches, athletic trainers and all others who work in athletics.

Supporters of equality in sport for women have a stake in supporting legislation that protects athletic employees from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity as well. As long as any woman coach, administrator or other athletic staff member is subject to discrimination based on real or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity, all women are at risk being targeted by this kind of unfair treatment.

The Women’s Sports Foundation supports legislation that provides protection from discrimination based on real or perceived sexual orientation and gender identity. Women’s and men’s sport will benefit from ensuring that all participants are able to coach and compete in a climate where their achievements are based on their competence and character, not on their sex, sexual orientation or gender identity.

The Human Rights Campaign and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force are two of several organizations working to secure passage of ENDA.

Playing in the Closet

Like many girls in the United States, Andrea Zimbardi went to college to not only gain an education, but also to play the sport she loved. To be a student-athlete is a full-time job. You run from practice to class to the library, and occasionally you get to eat . . . usually with the team. Your team becomes your new family, players from different backgrounds bonded together by a mutual love for the game. So what is it that could have torn Zimbardi apart from the sport she loved and her softball family?

Zimbardi was a few throws away from setting a school record in March 2003 when her coach Karen Johns cut her from the softball team. She stood up to a coach who used fear as a tool to control her players: homophobia. Homophobia in collegiate sports is an ongoing issue that affects every level of athletics from coaches, players, parents and fans. Not only is it something that has tainted the spirit of what sports stand for, but also it is a reflection of how society views women who have dared to step out of their pre-cut gender roles. If women plan on continuing to succeed in the sports world, then all athletes and coaches must work at respecting one another, no matter what diverse background their teammates or players might represent.

The Gender Issue

“You throw like a girl” is a typical insult that has echoes across time as well as playgrounds across the country. Men and boys have always used that phrase to cut each other down on the field and in the locker room. Sports exist as a sacred pastime where boys become men, and men become indestructible heroes. For a woman to step onto the same field where seeds of masculinity are planted is to trample the future of male-dominated leaders. If a woman can throw, hit and catch as well as a boy of her own age, then what’s stopping her from being his equal in the business world? The submissive role that women have traditionally been forced into is challenged by a successful female athlete, and as a result, also bends gender roles. To combat this, often the most common way to attack a female athlete is to challenge her femininity and question her sexuality. If a woman’s sexual preference is in question, then it becomes a way to control her.

Homo-negativity on the Field

One of the most prominent places that homophobia has been used to control women is in collegiate athletic departments. Over the years, the male college recruiting process has been tainted with scandals involving big athletes receiving cars, money and women to go to certain schools. However, the process for women has been a little different. Opposed to an incentive like a new car, many times parents and athletes are fed lies and false accusations to alter the impression of a rival school. Schools and coaches are labeled as producing “lesbians” in an effort to sway parents’ and players’ decisions. But the problem doesn’t just stop at recruiting. Once at a school athletes are susceptible to being ostracized by other players if they do come out and have been thrown off teams or unfairly benched due to their sexuality. “If you’re an athlete on a team, the coach has all the cards and power in terms of determining what your future is; and if that coach is homophobic, then you’re going to stay deep in the closet,” explained Pat Griffin, author of Strong Women, Deep Closets.

Griffin was both an athlete and a coach who was forced to stay silent about her sexuality, and in her book, she describes her story, as well as several other athletes’ stories about the unnecessary pressure placed on women by the homophobic sports world. Her experiences as a coach in the closet were equally as horrifying as those she had as a player. Many times in fear of losing her job, Griffin was forced to alter her life to cater to what college administrators wanted her to be. Her story is not unique though, in the sense that there are women working in athletic departments across the United States who are forced into putting up a facade everyday. In Strong Women, Deep Closets, one Division II basketball coach talks about her athletic director going to the extreme of following her home to see if she went to her house or her girlfriend’s after work when he suspected her being gay.

Two-fold Fix

The harassment and abuse of players and coaches based on their sexuality is an unnecessary college experience that needs to stop. Two ways to remedy the problem are through education and the law. “Education and legal remedy go hand-in-hand in any social change movement,” said Griffin. “The law has played a huge role here, and that’s where organizations like the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), who look for gay, lesbian or bisexual people in athletics who have been discriminated against, take their case and provide legal council. That is a great avenue for change.”

That change has recently been demonstrated at the University of Florida. Zimbardi now will be known not only for her great arm, but also for her courage to make things a little easier for herself and other players in the (LGBT community. Zimbardi brought to the athletic administration’s attention that Johns created an uncomfortable environment for those who didn’t share her Christian beliefs and claimed that Johns had outed coaches and players. All coaches, athletic directors and staff are now required to attend diversity training in response to a settlement for the groundbreaking case, and the university’s non-discrimination policy now also includes sexual orientation. Johns was also recently fired. This case is important because it demonstrates how the law can correct injustices such as being discriminated against based on sexual orientation and how education can prevent it from happening to a player or coach later on.

Be Part of the Education

Education is the most important key to stopping anti-gay harassment in sports. The law is a reaction to the injustice inflicted, but educational programs help ensure that those injustices never happen in the first place. Some ways to get your own team on the road to accepting players who are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender are:

  • Don’t use anti-gay slurs: Saying negative comments or slurs about someone’s sexuality is just as bad as insulting a player about his or her race or religion. Insults don’t belong in sports, period.
  • Speak out against what makes you uncomfortable: The most important agent in educating people about LGBT issues is to talk. If people are being harassed on your team, speak out against it. If you stay silent, then you’re just adding to the problem.
  • Don’t judge others based on stereotypes: Don’t judge people’s sexuality based on how much pink they wear or how short their hair is. Stereotypes are a way for people to classify others without really getting to know who they are. They create a wall between you and your coach or teammate. Respect everyone’s differences.
  • Listen to how others feel: Talking is important, but listening is just as imperative. Take time to listen to what your teammates or coaches. It will make their lives easier to know they have people supporting them.

Women in the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games

The Women’s Sports Foundation is pleased to release Women in the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games: An Analysis of Participation, Leadership, and Media Opportunities. This is the third in the series that follows the progress of women in the Olympic and Paralympic movement. The report provides the most accurate, comprehensive, and up-to-date examination of the participation trends among female Olympic and Paralympic athletes and the hiring trends of Olympic and Paralympic governing bodies with respect to the number of women who hold leadership positions in these organizations. The report also looks at newspaper and internet coverage of the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games.

The study was conducted by Dr. Maureen Smith from California State University, Sacramento and Dr. Alison M. Wrynn from California State University, Long Beach.

A distinguished panel of women’s sports experts reviewed the report and policy recommendations were issued. These recommendations can be found at the conclusion of the report.

Women Play Sports But Not on TV

A 20-year study of network and cable by USC & Purdue sociologists find men take 96% of sports news in 2009.

Even the ESPN Ticker gives women the short shrift – 96.4 percent of the information scrolling along the bottom of the screen was dedicated to only men’s sports.

The finding is part of a 20-year study of sports coverage released today by University of Southern California sociologist Mike Messner and Purdue University sociologist Cheryl Cooky.

Though it wasn’t surprising to discover that men’s sports gets more coverage, it was eye opening when researchers found that women’s sports accounted for less than 2 percent of network news and ESPN Sportscenter.

“There’s a message that sports is still for, by and about men,” Messner said. “When will the news catch up?”

Just as shocking is that as more women than ever participate in all levels of sports, coverage of their gender is drastically declining. In 2004, network affiliates dedicated 6.3 percent to women’s sports. Last year it dropped to 1.6 percent.

“News programs are supposed to be a window to the world and there is a journalistic responsibility to reflect that,” said Messner, an expert in the sociology of sports.

In 1971, 294,000 high school girls played interscholastic sports. Today 3.1 million play, much closer to the 4.4 million boys who play high school sports.

Yet network affiliates ran 60 stories on men’s NCAA basketball in March 2009. There were zero stories about women.

It’s not that generous coverage of men’s sports leaves no time for women. The researchers found that newscasts routinely air light sports features, such as a story about a hamburger with 5000 calories and 300 grams of fat at a minor league baseball park in Michigan.

The discrepancy is important, Messner said, as it reinforces the historical stereotype that sports proves men are superior to women, that the women’s product isn’t the same quality or would not have the same mass appeal. Messner points out those arguments have been used before, such as when African Americans weren’t considered good enough to compete in Major League Baseball.

The study, Gender in Televised Sports: News and Highlights Shows, 1989-2009, can be downloaded below.

As with the 1989, 1993, 1999 and 2004 studies, the central aim of the current study was to compare the quantity and quality of TV news and highlight shows’ coverage of women’s versus men’s athletic events. Each time researchers analyzed three two-week segments (a total of six weeks) of televised sports news coverage on each of three Los Angeles local network affiliates. Second, they studied ESPN’s SportsCenter, replicating their focus on this sports highlights show that they began in 1999 and continued in 2004.

The study is sponsored by the USC Center for Feminist Research.

Her Life Depends on It II

In December 2009 the Women’s Sports Foundation released a new and expanded comprehensive review of its essential “Her Life Depends On It” report, first released in 2004. The benchmark 2009 review draws critical conclusions that further emphasize the vital roles that sports play in the physical and social health of girls and women. The report is compiled from more than 2,000 studies examining women’s athletics and health, including hundreds of new studies conducted in the five years since the last report was released.

Women in the 2000, 2004 and 2008 Olympic and Paralympic Games

This report analyzes the representation and participation of women in the international and U.S. Olympic organizations relative to the Olympic and Paralympic Games, especially for 2000, 2004, and 2008. In addition it examines the types and extent of opportunities that are provided for women in administrative and leadership roles within these structures and the chances women have to compete in the Games themselves. This report also assesses the extent that the IOC, IPC and USOC are fulfilling their stated missions with respect to fairness and gender equity and whether or not legal statutes are being upheld. Finally, there is analysis of media coverage of female athletes in the 2008 Olympic Games.

Go Out and Play – Understudied Populations

Go Out and Play: Youth Sports in America is a comprehensive research report that covers a range of topics including sports access for children with disabilities. Significant numbers of children from immigrant families are involved with sports and exercise. Their interest is palpable, but for reasons we do not understand, girls lag behind boys in participation.