Equity in Athletics, Inc., v. Department of Education and James Madison University, et al., March 8, 2011

Flickr User: s_falkow Flickr User: s_falkow

 

Content Summary

The Women’s Sports Foundation reprints this unanimous opinion by the 4th Circuit with our highlights, which affirms the dismissal of the litigation at the earliest stage of litigation. The case was brought by an anti-Title IX group that was attempting to weaken the law. The appellate panel rejected all the claims by the group, Equity in Athletics Inc.. The court held that the university's actions, when it substantially decreased the size of its athletic department for men and women, were constitutional and conformed with federal law. The court specifically upheld the 1979 3-part test as not being a quota and promulgated improperly. The 4th Circuit noted the unanimity of the law as applied to athletics across the country. The same legal reasoning is now being used to try to Title IX in the high school context, and will likely receive similar treatment.

EQUITY IN ATHLETICS v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY, et al. (PDF 272k)

Download Now

Published Aug 3, 2011
By Women's Sports Foundation

EXPLORE FURTHER

WSF Responds to the CSC Study on NCAA Tennis

As in past press releases, the CSC has taken highly selective NCAA data in order to fit their agenda, this time focusing exclusively on college tennis.

A Practical Guide to Gender Equity

We know that as you uncover inequities, you may want to correct them with the determination of athletes striving for victory. To guide you on your path, we have developed this step-by-step playbook to move you through your gender equity event.

What Every Female Athlete Should Know

Did you know that because a sport is revenue-producing or has more spectators, these facts cannot be used as an excuse for treating male athletes better than female athletes?

STAY IN-THE-KNOW

Sign up for our newsletter to receive infrequent updates, news and information.

SUBSCRIBE