Equity in Athletics, Inc., v. Department of Education and James Madison University, et al., March 8, 2011

Flickr User: s_falkow Flickr User: s_falkow

 

Content Summary

The Women’s Sports Foundation reprints this unanimous opinion by the 4th Circuit with our highlights, which affirms the dismissal of the litigation at the earliest stage of litigation. The case was brought by an anti-Title IX group that was attempting to weaken the law. The appellate panel rejected all the claims by the group, Equity in Athletics Inc.. The court held that the university's actions, when it substantially decreased the size of its athletic department for men and women, were constitutional and conformed with federal law. The court specifically upheld the 1979 3-part test as not being a quota and promulgated improperly. The 4th Circuit noted the unanimity of the law as applied to athletics across the country. The same legal reasoning is now being used to try to Title IX in the high school context, and will likely receive similar treatment.

EQUITY IN ATHLETICS v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY, et al. (PDF 272k)

Download Now

Published Aug 3, 2011
By Women's Sports Foundation

EXPLORE FURTHER

Learn More

On November 30, former University of Minnesota Duluth coaches Shannon Miller, Jennifer Banford, and Annette Wiles, along with current and former student-athletes, have filed a complaint with the Office for Civil Rights.

Standard Language of Title IX

In order to comply with the athletic requirements of Title IX, educational institutions must meet the requirements of three areas.

Learn about Title IX

Since 1972, female participation in high school sports has increased by more than 900%. Yes, girls want to play, too.

STAY IN-THE-KNOW

Sign up for our newsletter to receive infrequent updates, news and information.

SUBSCRIBE